UTMB HANDBOOK OF OPERATING PROCEDURES

Section 5 Faculty Policies Subject 5.3 Appointments and Rank Policy 5.3.8 Faculty Grievance Policy

08/01/03 -Originated 05/19/05 -Reviewed w/ changes -Reviewed w/o changes Council of Deans -Author

Faculty Grievance Policy

Audience

This policy applies to any full-time or part-time UTMB faculty member.

Policy

The grievance process provides a means to resolve disputes that have not been resolved through the normal process of reasoned discussion. The grievance process is intended to define clearly the matters that are at issue; to assure the faculty member that his or her complaint or problem has been presented to and considered by appropriate University officials and bodies; and, to assure the University community that decisions involving faculty members in their relationship to the University are fully considered. The following are not grievable under this policy: • Complaints relative to discrimination if based on race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, disability or sex (including sexual harassment). These shall be filed and processed pursuant to UTMB’s Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Grievance Procedure. See IHOP Policy 3.2.1, Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action. • Faculty issues regarding actions or decisions by the administration that are reviewed under separate procedures provided for in the Institutional Handbook of Operating Procedures, or other approved policies or procedures of the University, including decisions related to appointment, promotion, or tenure. Non-renewals are not grievable under this policy. A faculty member grieving the non-renewal of a faculty appointment must file a grievance directly with the Chief Academic Officer. • Matters pertaining to fiscal management, staffing or structure of the University, non-academic matters pertaining to activities of administrative offices reporting to the President or Vice Presidents, or conditions that are clearly beyond the control of the University. • The substance of institutional IHOP policies or the Regents’ Rules is not grievable; allegations of inequitable application of those policies are grievable. See IHOP Policy 1.1.2, Rules and Regulations of the Board of Regents. Any faculty member who has a grievance with respect to any other term or condition of their employment, including salary or with respect to such matters as assignment of duties, academic freedom or working conditions and no other appeal or grievance policy is provided for, shall have the right to grieve the matter as defined below. Faculty members will not be reprimanded or discriminated against in any way for initiating in good faith a grievance. To the extent allowed by Texas law, grievance materials will be considered confidential.

Facilitating Informal Resolutions

Wherever possible, collegial and informal resolution of problems, such as through discussion, negotiation, and mediation is encouraged and should be facilitated. Discussion and Negotiation As a first step in seeking relief and before a grievance complaint is filed, the faculty member is encouraged to attempt to resolve the dispute through discussion and negotiation privately entered into with the party whose actions or inactions give rise to the concern. These actions require no documentation. Mediation Mediation is encouraged at any time a difficult problem or dispute is encountered, and may be used at any point. Following the identification of a problem, and once informal discussion or negotiation has been unsuccessful; either party to a dispute can request mediation by directly contacting the UTMB Mediation Service. If both parties agree to mediate, the Mediation Service (which is coordinated through the Human Resources Department) will complete the mediation process in a timely fashion. If at any time during the mediation period the Mediator believes the parties cannot reach agreement, the parties shall be so informed and the mediation effort shall be discontinued unless both parties request that mediation should continue. Regardless of whether the mediation is successful or not, all parties shall respect University policy and state law regarding the confidentiality of the mediation proceedings. The only record of the mediation maintained by the University will be the date mediation occurred and whether an agreement was reached. UTMB Mediation Services will maintain this. Each party to the dispute will receive a written copy of any agreement reached. Unit/Department Resolution If attempts at discussion, negotiation, and/or mediation are unsuccessful, the faculty member should contact his or her unit leader (e.g., division chief, department chair) to discuss the situation informally. After talking with the faculty member, the unit leader may attempt to resolve the issue within the unit or may recommend mediation if it has not been attempted. If there is no satisfactory resolution by a unit leader and mediation is not being pursued, the faculty member may take the matter to the next level reporting official, (i.e., the department chair). These steps, while encouraged, are not mandatory.

Facilitating Informal Resolutions (cont'd)

Unit/Department Resolution, continued Ordinarily, matters brought before second level reporting officials should be satisfactorily resolved within ten (10) business days. A satisfactory resolution connotes a decision or action plan intended to resolve the matter in a satisfactory manner with an acceptable timetable for implementation. • If no satisfactory resolution occurs at this level and mediation has failed or is not being pursued, the faculty member may file a formal grievance with the Office of Equal Opportunity & Diversity (OEO&D). The faculty member should remain aware of the formal grievance filing deadline. • If informal negotiations are proving fruitful, the faculty member should request from the director of the OEO&D a formal extension of his or her formal grievance filing deadline.

Formal Grievance Process

A grievance must be submitted in writing no later than sixty (60) days from the time the event initiating the grievance occurred or from the time that the faculty member, with due diligence, should have become aware of the action causing the grievance. The written grievance documentation should express in factual terms its basis and the remedy sought. It must also contain details of any informal attempts to resolve the dispute, but cannot reveal the substance of any discussions that occurred during mediation. The OEO&D will have up to five (5) business days to review the grievance and make a decision as to whether the grievance involves discrimination or harassment and should be resolved through another process. The OEO&D will also consult with the Chief Academic Officer (CAO), or rising CAO (the Dean scheduled to rotate to chair of the Council of Deans (COD) in the following year) if the CAO has a conflict, to determine if the grievance is grievable under this policy. If the determination is made that the grievance is grievable, the OEO&D will coordinate the grievance process. The OEO&D shall forward the grievance to the Dean of the school to which the faculty member is appointed. The Dean shall investigate the grievance by gathering information from all parties concerned. Action by the Dean may include making a decision on the merits of the case, or recommending mediation (if it has not previously been attempted). Grievances directly involving actions or inactions by Deans will be forwarded to the CAO for disposition. The CAO will have the same options and time requirements for disposition as defined below for the Dean. If the grievance involves the CAO, the rising CAO will process the grievance. The Dean must notify the faculty member within ten (10) business days following receipt of the grievance of his/her decision or recommendation.

Formal Grievance Process, (cont’d)

If the faculty member agrees to the Dean’s recommendation of mediation, and the mediation does not successfully resolve the issue to the satisfaction of the faculty member, then the matter is again formally submitted to the Dean by the mediator, and the Dean has ten (10) business days to decide the issue. If the faculty member formally notifies the Dean that he or she does not agree to mediate the issue, then the Dean has an additional ten (10) business days to make a decision. Once the Dean has issued a decision on the grievance, the faculty member has ten (10) business days to consider the decision and notify the Dean in writing that the decision is acceptable or unacceptable and that he/she wishes to have the grievance reviewed by the Faculty Grievance Board. If such notice is not received during this ten (10) day period, the university will consider that the matter has been resolved satisfactorily and the case will be officially closed. If notice is received during the ten (10) day period, the Dean must refer the grievance to the Faculty Grievance Board within five (5) business days. Considerations by the Faculty Grievance Board The Faculty Grievance Board will be comprised of representatives from each school, the number being in proportion to the total number of faculty currently serving as full-time UTMB faculty members. Eight (8) members will be from the School of Medicine, four (4) members will represent the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, four (4) members will be selected to represent the School of Nursing and four (4) members will be selected to represent the School of Allied Health Sciences. The Deans of each school will recommend representatives to serve on the board from among those full time tenured members of the faculty who are not on leave. An additional 20 representatives will be nominated by the Faculty Senate from among the full-time tenured faculty not on leave. These representatives will not be current members of the Senate. The President will review and appoint board members from among those recommended. Members will serve for three (3) years with the terms of appointment staggered so that one-third of the members’ terms will expire each year. The President will appoint both a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Faculty Grievance Board. The Chairperson and Vice-Chair must be from different schools. Members will serve a maximum of six (6) consecutive years. Considerations by the Faculty Grievance Board, continued The Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board will receive all grievances referred to it. In cases involving a conflict of interest for the Chairperson of the Faculty Grievance Board, the Vice-Chairperson will serve and select the hearing panel.

Formal Grievance Process (cont’d)

Faculty Grievance Hearing Panel For each grievance set for hearing, the Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board will select three (3) members for service on the Faculty Grievance Hearing Panel. An attempt will be made to select faculty members who hold a rank equivalent to or higher than that of the faculty member filing the grievance and to avoid the assignment of panelists who may have a conflict of interest. Hearing panels should ordinarily consist of members representing more than one school. The Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board shall appoint the Panel within ten (10) business days of the receipt of the grievance and notify both parties of the composition of the panel. The Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board will designate a chair for the Hearing Panel. Any newly appointed member of the hearing panel who believes they have a conflict of interest or inability to be impartial regarding the matter being grieved should notify the Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board of this conflict and should recuse themselves from participation. The Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board shall make the final determination of whether a panel member has a conflict. Each party to the grievance may challenge the service of any member of the Hearing Panel on the basis of a conflict of interest. Such a challenge must be made in writing to the Chair of the Grievance Board within five (5) business days of receipt of the notice of the Panel membership. Receipt will be presumed unless the faculty member is on leave or on approved travel. The Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board shall rule on all challenges and her/his decision shall be final. All hearings will be transcribed by a court reporter. Transcription costs associated with the hearing are to be borne by the Office of the Dean of the School in which the grievant has his or her primary faculty appointment. The conduct of the hearing will be in accordance with the procedures discussed in the Faculty Grievance Hearing Panel Procedures Handbook. After the Hearing The Hearing Panel shall determine its findings and recommendations based upon a vote of a majority of the members. The Panel shall prepare a written report of its findings, including the reasons for the findings, its recommendations, and any dissenting views. • If the appeal is from a decision of a Dean then this report shall be forwarded to the Chief Academic Officer. • If the Chief Academic Officer is the Dean who initially heard the grievance, then the report will be presented to the President.

Formal Grievance Process (cont’d)

• If the appeal is from a decision of the Chief Academic Officer, then the report shall be presented to the President. The report and recommendation of the Hearing Panel shall be sent within ten (10) business days after the conclusion of the hearing. Within thirty (30) days, the recipient of the Hearing Panel’s report and recommendation (i.e., the Chief Academic Officer or the President) shall report in writing to both parties to the grievance and to the Chair of the Faculty Grievance Board his or her decision in the matter, an explanation of that decision, and what remedial action, if any, will be taken. A copy of the report and recommendation of the Hearing Panel will be sent to both parties at this time as well. • If the decision was made by the President, the decision is final. • If the decision was made by the Chief Academic Officer, either party can appeal this decision to the President by delivering a written appeal to the Office of the President within ten (10) business days of the date of the Chief Academic Officer’s decision. Upon such appeal, all written decisions in the grievance process shall be forwarded to the President for review. The decision of the President is final.