Quality Assurance Review (QAR) Program Guidelines
Overview
UTMB Audit Services maintains an ongoing QAR program. The purpose of the program is to provide reasonable assurance that internal auditing work conforms with The Institute of Internal Auditors' (IIA) International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards), the System Audit Office Charter and departmental policies and procedures. The program's key elements are engagement supervision, external reviews and internal reviews.
Supervision
Auditors with supervisory responsibilities are responsible for providing the level of supervision necessary to ensure that engagement work conforms to The IIA Standards and internal policies and procedures. Supervision includes providing appropriate guidance in planning and performing engagement work and in communicating engagement results to the client.
External QAR Program
The University of Texas System Medical Branch Director of Audits engages an external reviewer to perform an independent review of the internal audit program every three years. The President of UTMB and the Director of The University of Texas System Administration Internal Audit approves the selection of the external reviewer.
Internal QAR Program
The Director of Audits has established an internal QAR program to evaluate the quality of engagement work performed. The quality reviews are generally conducted by a member of the Audit Services team assigned by the Director of Audits or Engagement Manager.
The focus of the internal QARs is to verify that engagement fieldwork and workpapers conform to The IIA Standards, generally accepted governmental auditing standards (“Yellow Book”) and departmental policies and procedures for conducting engagements, which address administrative matters, including performing auditor performance evaluations, securing paper and electronic engagement files, and obtaining client feedback about the engagement process.
The general process for an internal QAR is as follows:
- The QAR is conducted by staff as assigned by the Director of Audits or Engagement Manager.
- In many cases, it will be necessary and/or appropriate to conduct the review at the time the draft report is ready to be transmitted to the client. A brief follow-up review is to be performed after the final report is provided to the client to verify that administrative matters have been completed.
- By following the QAR steps, the assigned reviewer verifies engagement workpapers are in conformity with The IIA Standards and departmental policies and procedures.
- The reviewer informs the Engagement Manager or Lead Auditor of the results and suggests actions to improve workpaper clarity or completeness, or other points noted in the review.
- The Engagement Manager or Lead Auditor addresses the review notes and presents changes to the reviewer.
- If it is determined that review notes are not addressed to the reviewer's satisfaction, the Engagement Manager and the Director of Audits discuss and determine the appropriate course of action to take in clearing outstanding review notes.
- Once complete the reviewer signs off on the completion of the QAR to signify an internal review has occurred and the workpapers conform to The IIA Standards, generally accepted governmental auditing standards (“yellow book”) and departmental policies and procedures.