UTMB Department of Neurology

Huntington's Disease Clinic

Department of Neurology
University of Texas Medical Branch
301 University Blvd., Suite 9.128
Galveston, Texas 77555-0539
Phone: 409-772-2646
Fax: 409-772-6940
Email:
teashiza@utmb.edu 
Contents
 

Previous Page  |  Page 4 

Predictive Testing for HD: New Challenges

Advantage of the direct DNA test.

Predictive and prenatal testing for HD has been available using linkage analysis since shortly after the mapping of the gene in 1983. Linkage analysis is a probability-based analysis and requires testing of multiple family members including affected relatives and thus, for those individuals whose affected relatives or other key family members were deceased or not willing to be tested, predictive testing was impossible. With the direct gene test, the HD gene status of at-risk individuals could be determined by a simple blood test of the subject without involving the family members. However, predictive testing is offered in the context of an interdisciplinary program with a well defined protocol, because of the regarding psychological, social, legal and ethical concerns.

Who can have the predictive testing?

In most instances, the individual seeking predictive HD testing is an adult with a 50% risk for HD. The current DNA testing guidelines recommend against testing juvenile (below the legal age of 18) at-risk subjects who do not have clinical diagnosis of HD. It should be noted that “soft” signs of HD, such as learning disability, depression, and uncomplicated seizures, should not be considered sufficient to establish the clinical diagnosis of HD unless characteristic movement disorders and/or progressive cognitive dysfunction accompany these conditions. Predictive testing of individuals at 25% risk is problematic when the at-risk parent is living and unwilling to be tested. The positive result in the 25% at-risk individuals discloses that the 50% at-risk parent is a gene carrier. Confidentiality of the test result must be strictly maintained in such cases.

Procedures for the predictive DNA testing.

The predictive DNA testing for HD requires at least three visits. One is scheduled a few weeks prior to the blood drawing. Psychological testing, genetic counseling, and a neurological examination will be obtained during the first visit. During the pre-test counseling, the reasons for taking the test, and the potentially severe negative psychological impact, as well as the social and legal implications of the test, are discussed. Many patients decide not to take the predictive DNA testing after the first counseling, and some others learn how to prepare for the complicated consequences of the DNA diagnosis. This confirms the necessity of the pre-testing visit.

During the second visit a blood sample is drawn from the subject for the DNA test. The subjects will be briefly counseled to make sure he/she is well prepared for testing. At the third visit, which takes place about three weeks later, the result is disclosed to the subject. Subjects are encouraged to call or visit the clinic whenever questions or concerns arise. All patients are made aware that post-test counseling/evaluation by any of the team members is available at any time.

Patients are encouraged to have a person significant in their lives such as, a spouse, close friend or relative, attend all visits with them. This companion should not be someone who has HD or is at risk for having HD. We also suggest the patient have a trained support person in their community such as, a psychiatrist, psychologist, social worker or clergy to whom they can turn for immediate psychological support during and after the testing process.

If at all possible, testing of an affected relative prior to the subject’s testing, is often required to ensure a correct diagnosis. If an affected relative has already been tested, medical records of the affected individual should be obtained. If no individuals with HD are alive, medical records confirming the diagnosis should be submitted.

We encourage patients who desire testing but cannot afford it to call and discuss their situation. An individual's insurance may or may not cover these expenses. Insurance payment may interfere with confidentiality. Some individuals have been denied insurance after testing positive for HD or even being at risk for HD. Discrimination of subjects with a positive HD DNA test at the workplace is a concern. Many individuals have taken the predictive DNA test by paying out of their own pocket because of these concerns. Some patients have even used a different name and social security number to conceal their identities. Of course, this can only be done if they are paying cash for the test.

Prenatal Testing

The direct gene test allows for highly accurate prenatal diagnosis. The sample must be obtained by an amniocenthesis or a chorionic villus biopsy, which are minor but invasive procedure routinely done at an outpatient clinic. Prenatal testing should not be performed unless abortion is planned if the fetus has a positive result. Otherwise, the mother and fetus would be exposed to small but unnecessary risk associated with the procedure. Furthermore, the fetus would have to grow up with the genetic information, and this violates the guidelines of no testing of asymptomatic juveniles. The number of CAGs in the fetus should not be used to predict the age of onset or the prognosis of HD.

CURRENT MEDICAL TREATMENT OF HUNTINGTON’S DISEASE

The first step in the management of patients with Huntington s disease (HD) is education of the patient and the family about the nature of the disease and the prognosis. This must be coupled with skilled genetic and psychological counseling. Because of the complexity and high variability of the symptoms in HD, medical therapy must be individualized and tailored to specific needs of the patient. The medications are targeted to control the most troublesome symptoms.

Depression, commonly seen even in early stages of the disease, is partly biological and partly situational arising from the realization of impending progressive functional impairment. Even with a plenty of support from family and friends, most patients will eventually require medical therapy. The serotonergic drugs such as fluoxetine and sertraline are helpful in patients who, in addition to depression, exhibit obsessive compulsive disorder. Tricyclic antidepressants, such as amitriptyline, imipramine and nortriptyline, are also effective, and have the advantage of alleviating insomnia and fighting weight loss by stimulating appetite. Both insomnia and weight loss are frequent problems in HD. Anxiolytics, such as diazepam, alpralozam, and clonazepam, may be helpful to control agitation. We also sometimes use carbamazepine, valproate, and lithium to help control manic behavior. Impulse control problems may respond to a trial with clonidine or propranolol. Rarely, electroconvulsive therapy is required in patients with medically intractable depression.

Psychosis may be treated with dopamine receptor blocking drugs (neuroleptics), such as haloperidol, pimozide, fluphenazine and thioridazine. However, these drugs can induce tardive dyskinesia (drug induced involuntary movements) and should be used only if absolutely needed to control symptoms. A new generation of atypical antipsychotic drug that does not cause tardive dyskinesia, may be a useful alternative to the typical neuroleptics.

Neuroleptics are the most effective drugs in the treatment of chorea, although they may cause tardive dyskinesia. Monoamine depleting drugs, such as reserpine and tetrabenazine, have the advantage that they do not cause tardive dyskinesia. In our experience, tetrabenazine is the most effective suppressant of chorea, but this drug is categorized as investigational and not readily available in the U.S. . Both classes of neuroleptics may cause or exacerbate depression, sedation, akathisia and parkinsonism.

Supportive therapies such as nursing care, psychological adjustments, physical therapy, speech therapy, diet modifications, etc. become essential as the disease progresses. Patients with advanced HD require prevention and treatments of various medical complications.

NEW TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Treatment of Huntington's disease (HD) has been limited to symptomatic and supportive therapies. A number of medications have been introduced to treat chorea, depression, anxiety and psychosis as described in the previous section. While some of them are quite effective for alleviating the symptoms and play essential roles in management of HD, they do not stop the disease process itself. Simply, they mask the symptoms. Since 1993, the research has been providing increasing understanding of the disease mechanisms, allowing for discussions on new therapeutic strategies. Some of them are becoming available for clinical trials, while others require further development as clinically feasible therapies.

There is substantial evidence that the final pathway of cell death in the brain of HD patients involves excitotoxicity. The excitotoxic loss of neurons is mediated by binding of excitatory amino acids to their receptors. Among these excitatory amino acids, glutamate appears to produce excitotoxicity by binding to one type of glutamatergic receptor called N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in HD. Drugs that inhibit the glutamatergic transmission may be useful for treating HD patients. These include blockers of a glutamate receptor, such as remacemide, and drugs that inhibit a release or synthesis of glutamate, such as riluzole (Rilutek), lamotrigine (Lamictal) and gabapentin (Neurontin). One of these medications, Riluzole, has a slight (10%) benefit on the life-spans of patients with Lou Gehrig's disease (another neurological disease known as ALS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, in which excitotoxicity appears to contribute to disease). Riluzole is currently being studied by the Huntington Study Group. Lamotrigine and remacemide has failed to show efficacy in treatment of patients with HD, although remacemide may suppress chorea.

Since energy metabolism abnormalities may play an important role in excitotoxic cell death in HD, drugs that improve the energy metabolism, such as coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), idebenone and nicotinamide, may be of interest in treatment of HD. CoQ10 has shown a trend of efficacy in slowing down the progression of HD in a recent study, although the efficacy did not reach the statistical significance. Antioxidants such as alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) and thioctic acid may also be studied. Excitotoxicity increases the concentration of calcium in the cells. Various calcium channel blockers, inhibitors of calcium binding proteins and inhibitors of calcium- activated enzymes such as nitric oxide synthetase (NOS) may be included in the strategies for prevention of cell death in HD. NOS produces a tissue-damaging free radicals and its neuronal isoform (nNOS) is involved in neurotoxicity.

Neurosurgical procedures have shown promising results in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). These procedures include pallidotomy, thalamotomy and deep brain stimulation. Because of the development of CT-guided stereotactic neurosurgical technique, these procedures have become much less invasive. Whether these procedures are effective in HD is yet to be seen, premiminary data have suggested that some of the abrasive procedures (i.e., deliverate removal of tissue for treatment purposes) have no benefits in HD. The deep brain stimulation has not been tried on HD patients. Researchers also know that these procedures treat the symptoms of HD but they are not expected to stop the disease process. We should also be aware that the movement disorder is only a part of problems in HD, and loss of intellectual functions and psychiatric manifestations are unlikely to improve with these procedures. Nevertheless, if effective, these stereotactic neurosurgical procedures may offer a new treatment modality for HD patients.

In PD, fetal brain tissue transplantation has shown some success in restoring the functions of the lost neurons. Similar approaches may work in HD. A research team in Phoenix used fetal cell transplants to treat over eleven patients with HD. Although they reported that the transplantation halted the progression and reversed some deterioration, the study is still too preliminary to assess the true therapeutic value of the procedure. Nevertheless, investigators at the University of South Florida also demonstrated that the transplantation of fetal brain tissue is feasible, and French investigators found encouraging preliminary results. Alternative tissue sources may also be considered. In Massachusetts , fetal pig striatal tissues have been transplanted in some HD patients. Recent advances in research on neuronal stem cells may have significant impact on this line of research. If we can identify neurotrophic factors that support the survival of degenerating cells in the striatum, transplantation of genetically engineered cell lines producing the neurotrophic factors may be another interesting approach.

The understanding of how HD molecules affect the brain give hope to new approaches that may be able to attack HD at an earlier stage. This earlier intervention may be more effective since it may prevent neurons from injury instead of trying to rescue them after the fact. The mutant huntingtin protein with an elongated glutamine repeat tract causes toxic effects to the brain cells. Thus, supplementing the normal huntingtin protein by conventional gene therapy is unlikely to solve the problem in HD. The rational approach would be alleviating the toxicity by (1) to eliminate the mutant huntingtin protein or (2) to prevent the mutant huntingtin protein from producing the gain-of-function effects. In HD, the expanded CAG repeat in the gene is transcribed into an expanded CAG repeat in the mRNA, which is then translated into an expanded glutamine repeat in the huntingtin protein. At present, selective inhibition of the mutant HD gene transcription and translation is not feasible. More promising is the second approach. We now know that the huntingtin protein interacts to other proteins. Thus, modulators of such interactions may decrease the gain of function effect, leading to a therapeutic effect. Transgenic mouse and fruit fly models of HD can be effectively used to screen drugs with such actions. Research efforts to find such modulators is underway, and some promising drugs have already found. For example, minocycline, which is a widely used antibiotics, was found to block caspase activities, and administration of minocycline has shown improvement of HD-like disease in transgenic mice. Efficacy of roal minocycline administration for treatment of HD is currently being tested in human. Highly unsaturated fatty acids such as ethyl ester of eicosapentanoic acid (LAX101) have shown promising results in double-blind randomized control studies. Cystamine (transglutaminase inhibitor), tauroursodeoxycholic acid (hydrophilic bile acid), inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta, dichloracetate (pyruvate dehydrogenase stimulator), and histon deacetylase inhibitors (transcription modulator) have also been found to alleviate the disease in HD transgenic mice, and some of these will come to human trial. We are expecting to have a growing number of medications that need to be tested in human trials.


Previous Page  |  Page 4 


February 15, 2008

 

<< Previous page

UTMB | Search | Directories | Toolbox | News | Employment | Contact | Sitemap 
UT System | Reports to the State | Compact With Texans | Statewide Search
 
This site published by the webmaster, Mary Jo Singleton  for the Department of Neurology.

Copyright ©  2004  The University of Texas Medical Branch.
Please review our privacy policy and Internet guidelines.