Pediatric Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

TITLE: Pediatric Endoscopic = Sinus Surgery
SOURCE: Grand Rounds Presentation, UTMB, Dept. of Otolaryngology
DATE: April 25, 2007
RESIDENT PHYSICIAN: Murtaza Kharodawala, MD
FACULTY PHYSICIAN: Seckin Ulualp, MD<= /st1:State>
SERIES EDITORS: Francis B. Quinn, Jr., MD and Matthew W. Ryan, MD

"This material was prepared by resident physicians in partial fulfillment of educational requirements established for the Postgraduate Training Program = of the UTMB Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and was not intended for clinical use in its present form. It was prepared for the purp= ose of stimulating group discussion in a conference setting. No warranties, eit= her express or implied, are made with respect to its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. The material does not necessarily reflect the current or past opinions of members of the UTMB faculty and should not be used for purposes= of diagnosis or treatment without consulting appropriate literature sources and informed professional opinion."

Purpose

Sinus disease is a very common source of morbidity for= many children. On average, children average 6-8 upper respiratory tract infections per year. 5-13% of all URIs are complicated by secondary bacterial infection of the paranasal sinuses. Young children are u= nable to communicate some of the symptoms of sinusitis such as headache, nasal obstruction, and sinus pain/pressure. This may pose a diagnostic challenge to clinicians who must rely on parental reporting of symptoms and physical findings. The purpose of this Grand Rounds i= s to explore the evidence available investigating pediatric FESS to determine its indications, safety, and long-term efficacy. A focus is kept on the management = of chronic rhinosinusitis in the pediatric populat= ion.

History

Pediatric endoscopic sinus= surgery was first performed in the late 1980s with reported short term success over 80%. The initial surgical indications were broad. Indic= ations for adult FESS were sometimes used in the pediatric population, without evidence-based data. Initial studies of pediatric FESS were often retrospective, without a comparison to medically treated or non-treated group.&nb= sp; A paradigm shift occurred when prospective studies indicated that medical therapy was an effective approach to treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in the pediatric population. Additionally, research in animals revealed that sinus surgery may have a significant effect on the developing facial skeleton. Recent studi= es have conducted using an evidence-based approach to pediatric sinus disease = that includes FESS as an option.

Indications for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Children

In 1998, a consensus panel in Belgium determined guidelines= for FESS in children. There were 9 indications listed: complete = nasal obstruction in cystic fibrosis caused by massive polyp= osis or closure of the nose by medialization of the lateral nasal wall, antro-choanal polyps, intracranial complications of sinus disease, mucoceles= and mucopyoceles, orbital abscesses, traumatic = injury to the optic canal, dacrocystorhinitis secondar= y to sinusitis, fungal sinusitis, and some meningo-encephal= oceles. A possible indication listed was C= RS refractory to medical management. An additional indication found in recent literature utilizing FESS is for surgical resection of anterior skull-base tumors including juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma.

CRS in Children

CRS was listed as a possible indication for pediatric = FESS in the consensus meeting. CRS usually carries a multifactorial etiology. This disease process is due to an = insult to normal drainage pathways of the paranasal si= nuses leading to stasis of secretions and secondary overgrowth of microorganisms. Recurrent URIs change the normal mucosal thickness as well as impairing normal mucocilliary clearance of sect= ions. In the daycare setting or in environments with multiple children, the pediatric population is at risk of acquiring recurrent URIs. Additionally, children raised in households that smoke tobacco tend to have greater incidences of sinus and middle ear disease.

Allergic rhinitis, asthma, aspirin allergy, and atopy may contribute to the development of CRS. Allergic rhinitis is reported to be present in up to 40% of people at some point in childhood. It is also associated with up to 8= 0% of cases of CRS. Allergic rhinit= is, asthma, aspirin, and atopy may be present in the family of children with CRS. Additionally, serologic or skin testing for potential allergens shou= ld be considered in all children with CRS.&nb= sp;

Adenoid hypertrophy may obstruct the nasopharynx, thus preventing the normal clearance of secretions resulting in stasis and possible infection. Structural abnormalities, such as choanal stenosis/atresia, severely deviated septum, large obstructive agger nasi air cells, hypoplastic maxillary sinuses and bony remodeling due to active sinus disease processes= may obstruct normal clearance of secretions.&n= bsp; A CT<= /st1:Street> scan of the sinuses may be helpful in addition to endo= scopic findings in diagnosing these structural abnormalities.

Gastroesophageal reflux di= sease (GERD) has also been associated in children with CRS. One study discovered that 19 of 30 patients with CRS had tested positive for GERD by pH probe study. 79% of these patients showed impro= vement after medical and behavioral therapy for reflux. Another study found that 25 of 28 children who were candidates for FESS due to sinusitis were able to avoid surgery with a regimen of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and behavior modification. Empiric therapy= with a PPI with or without a prokinetic agent and be= havior modification is an acceptable approach for treating children with CRS suspe= cted to be due to reflux.

Immunologic deficiency, cystic fibrosis, and ciliary dyskinesia pose a significant problem to treatment of CRS.&n= bsp; Recurrent and chronic infections that respond poorly to medical ther= apy should warrant further immunologic workup in a child. Quantitative (antibody titers) and qualitative (T-cell function) immunologic testing should be considered in t= hese children. Additionally, recur= rent upper and lower respiratory tract infections should lead to further testing. A mucosal ciliary biopsy may be necessary to diagnose ciliary dyskinesia. A sweat chloride test should be performed in all children with sinonasal polyps= to investigate for cystic fibrosis.

Allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS) is a unique pathologic process that may result in severe sinus disease. It is caused by a hypersensitivity response to fungi in the paranasal sinuses. Apergilles, Alternaria, Bipolaris, Culvularia, and Drechslera are some of the common fungi known to cause AFS. In addition to the sinus symptoms = of CRS, children may have facial abnormalities such as pr= optosis due to bony remodeling of the facial skeleton. Charcot-Leydo= n crystals, degranulated eos= inophils, and the presence of fungal hyphae are diagnostic findings on micoscopic examination of the (“peanut butter”) sinonasal debris = or allergic mucin removed from patients with AFS.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> CT findings may reveal significant= sinonasal obstruction with double-density and signifi= cant bony remodeling with possible cranial or orbital extension.

Acute Bacterial Sinusitis

In order to understand CRS, the management of acute sinusitis must be discussed. = In 2001, Clinical Practice Guideline for the management of sinusitis in childr= en was published in Pediatrics. Different forms of sinusitis were also defined:

n&nb= sp; Acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS): bacterial infection of the paranasal sinuses lasting less than 30 days in which symptoms resolve completely.

n&nb= sp; Subacute bacteri= al sinusitis: bacterial infectio= n of paranasal sinuses lasting between 30-90 days in which symptoms resolve completely.

n&nb= sp; Recurrent acute bacterial sinusitis: episodes of bacterial infection of= the paranasal sinuses, each lasting less than 30 days and separated by intervals of at least 10 days during which the patient is asymptomatic.

n&nb= sp; Chronic sinusitis: episodes of inflammation of the paranasal sinuses lasting more than 90 days. Residual respiratory symptoms pers= ist such as rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, or cough= .

n&nb= sp; Acute bacterial sinusitis superimposed on chronic sinusitis: patients w= ith residual respiratory symptoms develop new respiratory symptoms. When treated with ntimicrobials, the new symptoms resolve, but underlying residual symptoms persist.

The recommendations made in this guideline were for management of ABS. Antibiotic= s were recommended to achieve a more rapid clinical cure. Children with uncomplicated ABS mi= ld to moderate severity not attending daycare are recommended to be treated with either amoxicillin 45 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses or 90 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses. For penicillin allergic patients, cefdinir (14 mg/kg/d in 1-2 doses), <= span class=3DSpellE>cefuroxime (30 mg/kg/d in 2 doses), cefpodoxime (10 mg/kg/d 1 dose), clarithromycin (15 mg/kg/d= 2 doses), or azithromycin (10 mg/kg/d on day 1, a= nd 5 mg/kg/d for 4 days) are recommended.

If symptoms are severe, or refractory usual amoxicilli= n or other antimicrobial, or daycare is attended high-dose amoxicillin-clavulinate (80-90 mg/kg/d in 2 doses) or IM ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg single dose) followed by oral t= herapy is recommended. Duration of t= herapy may be 10, 14, 21, or 28 days but an alternative suggestion is 7 days of therapy beyond resolution of symptoms.

For cases of failure of cure following oral antibiotic= s, IV cefotaxime or ceftriaxone= are recommended. A maxillary sinus aspiration may also be appropriate to determine the microbial species prese= nt and determine the antibiotic sensitivities. Children with complicated or suspe= cted complications of ABS should be treated promptly and aggressively and have appropriate consultations with an otolaryngologist, infectious disease specialist, ophthalmologist, and neurosurgeon. IV ceftriaxon= e (100 mg/kg/d in 2 doses) or ampicillin-sulbactam (200 mg/kg/d in 4 doses) should be started empirically and a maxillary sinus aspiration should be attempted. Vancomycin (60 mg/kg/d in 4 doses) may be used for ca= ses of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus = aureus or for patients with severe penicillin allergy= . A CT scan is also recommended to determine possible intracranial or orbital involvement such as an epidermal= or subperiosteal abscess which may not be easily diagnos= ed on physical findings of a young ill child.

The Role of Antibiotics in CRS

In 2001, Don published a study that recommended a step= wise protocol for the management of CRS in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of IV antibiotics for treatment of CRS in children. This was a retrospective study of = 70 patients with a diagnosis of CRS without cystic fibrosis, immunologic deficiencies, nor facial anatomic abnormalities with ages ranging from 10 months to 15 years. All patie= nts had at least 12 weeks of CRS symptoms with persistent sinus disease present= on CT after 3-4 weeks of oral antibiotics.&nb= sp; All patients underwent maxillary sinus aspiration and irrigation with selective adenoidectomy depending on presence of adenoid hypertrophy on CT = or intraoperative findings during maxillary sinus aspira= tion and placement of long-arm IV catheter.&nbs= p; All patients also underwent a 1-4 week course of (culture-directed w= hen possible) IV antibiotics. Interestingly, 73% of patients had at least one organism present on culture with H. influenzae being the most common pathogen present. 43% of pati= ents had multiple organisms on aspiration. The antibiotics used for treatment were cefurox= ime (43%), Unasyn (31%), ticar= cillin with clavulanate (21%), ce= ftriaxone (3%), and vancomycin (1%). 66% of patients also had a course = of oral antibiotics following completion of IV therapy. 10% of patients were reported to ha= ve relatively minor complications without any mortality.

An important finding of this study was that 89% of pat= ients had initial improvement after IV antibiotic therapy. Of these, 74% had long term follow= -up between 6 to 62 months (mean 25 months).&n= bsp; In this group with long term follow-up, 88% were reported to have lo= ng term improvement by the parents of the children. 12% did not have long-term improve= ment, but also did not require FESS. In the group with long term follow-up, 23% had no further episodes of sinusiti= s, whereas, 77% had subsequent episodes of sinusitis, but were reported to be completely resolved following oral antibiotic therapy. There was no reported difference i= n this group with improvement treated with concomitant adenoidectomy versus without adenoidectomy. 11% of patient= s in this study did not have initial improvement following IV antibiotics and required FESS. Of those requi= ring FESS, 88% had long-term follow-up. 43% had long-term improvement.

A protocol was proposed by Don et. al from this study = for children with CRS with symptoms 12 weeks duration or longer refractory to 3= -4 week treatment with oral antibiotics. First, they recommended an allergy and immunology assessment with appropriate medical management for those found to have abnormalities. For patients who were found to hav= e no evidence of allergic or immunologic disease and for patients refractory to medical management of these processes, a CT scan of the paranasal sinuses was deemed appropriate as the next step. For those with an anatomic abnorma= lity leading to sinus pathology, FESS was proposed. For those with positive findings of sinusitis without specific anatomic abnormalities, bilateral maxillary sinu= s lavage with culture directed IV antibiotics and selec= tive adenoidectomy was proposed. If there was no improvement, FESS was then deemed necessary.

This study indicated that medical management of pediat= ric CRS refractory to oral antibiotics is effective and relatively safe. FESS may be reserved for those pat= ients refractory to IV antibiotics. However, this study also had some limitations. It was a retrospective review of patients and there was no stratification for severity of symptoms. The questionnaire used in this stu= dy was not reported to be a validated questionnaire for reporting symptoms by the parents of the children investigated. Additionally, there was no standardized analysis of the CT findings = of the patients. The role of adenoidectomy could not be assessed in this population as another therapeut= ic option in the management of CRS in children. Lastly, the role of topical steroi= ds, saline irrigations, and antihistamines was not assessed. The data from this study is noneth= eless quite useful in attempting to manage CRS in children.

The Role of Adenoidectomy in CRS

Adenoid hypertrophy is not an uncommon finding in children. Adenoid hypertrophy= may lead to obstruction of the Eustachian tube as well as obstruction of the nasopharynx resulting in stasis of paranasal sinus secretions. Additionall= y, adenoid tissue has been found to be a reservoir for pathogenic bacteria. Stasis of secretions along with the presence of bacteria may result in sinusitis. Previous studies have indicated the efficacy of adenoidectomy in the treatment for chronic otitis media with effusion. Addition= ally, the overall success rate for adenoidectomy in the treatment of CRS in child= ren has been documented to be about 50%.

A study was conducted by Ramadan in 2004 to evaluate t= he success of FESS alone, adenoidectomy alone, and FESS with adenoidectomy as surgical options for children with CRS refractory to medical management. This was conducted as a prospective non-randomized study over 10 years and follow-up assessment at 12 months. The results of this study were that success rates were 87.3%, 75%, and 51.6% in the FESS with adenoidectomy, FE= SS alone, and adenoidectomy alone groups, respectively. Revision rates were 7.6%, 12.5%, a= nd 25%, respectively. Multivaria= ble analysis was performed using logistic regression model.

The success rate of surgery was noted to be 59.5% for children 6 years or younger. = This was significantly lower that children over 6 years who had a success rate of 84%. Children over the age of= 6 years who underwent FESS with adenoidectomy had the best success rate 96%, which was significantly higher than FESS alone (79%) and adenoidectomy alone (67%). Success rates were not significantly different for FESS with adenoidectomy (76%), FESS alone (67%), and adenoidectomy alone (44%) in children 6 years and under. In asthmatics within this study (4= 3.2%), success after surgery was found to be 62% compared to 80% for children with= out asthma. The success rate for asthmatics that underwent FESS with adenoidectomy (82%) was not significant= ly different from FESS alone (77%), but both groups were significantly better = than adenoidectomy alone (37%). In non-asthmatics, success with FESS with adenoidectomy was 90% but this was n= ot significantly different from the FESS alone group (79%), but was significan= tly better than adenoidectomy alone group (65%). For the children exposed to smoke = (27%), success after surgical therapy was not significantly different from the gro= up not exposed to smoke, 67% and 74%, respectively. For children exposed to smoke, FES= S with adenoidectomy had greater success (82%) compared to FESS alone (64%) and adenoidectomy alone (46%). An= additional variable analyzed in this study was severity of disease based upon Lund-McKay CT score. For patients with Lund= McKay score greater than 4, they had greatest success when FESS with adenoidectomy was performed compared to FESS alone and adenoidectomy alone (87%, 72%, and= 46% respectively). In children wi= th scores of 4 or less, there was no significant difference (90%, 100%, and 59= %). 47% of children in this study had allergies, and overall success after surgery for those with allergies was similar to those without allergies (74% and 71%, respectively). There were few surgical complications. 2.9% had minor orbital complications involving orbital entry and postoperative orbital ecchymosis without any complaints. No postoperative CSF leaks, bleedi= ng, or lacrimal duct injuries were found.

This study provided an insight into the best surgical intervention to perform in children with CRS refractory to medical manageme= nt based upon severity of disease and age.&nb= sp; Children with asthma exposed to smoking had least benefit from adenoidectomy alone, but a greater success when FESS was performed in addit= ion to adenoidectomy. Children ov= er 6 years with Lund-McKay score greater than 4 had a better outcome when FESS w= ith adenoidectomy was performed. A conservative approach for children age 6 and younger with a Lund-McKay scor= e 4 or less without asthma may be with an adenoidectomy alone as the initial procedure.

Quality of Life After Surgical Therapy for Sinus Dis= ease

A prospective, nonrandomized quality of life (QOL) stu= dy was conducted by Rudnick in 2006 using the validated SN-5 QOL survey completed = by caregivers of children following surgical therapy for = sinonasal disease. Adenoidectomy (59%) = and FESS (41%) were performed in these children with preoperative SN-5 assessme= nt as well as second assessment 6 months after surgery. This study revealed that all child= ren had significant improvement after surgical intervention and there was no significant difference in QOL scores between children undergoing adenoidect= omy versus FESS.

Accuracy of CT Finding in CRS in Children

Although CRS is a clinical diagnosis, CT findings are important in diagnosis. In 20= 04, Bhattacharyya et al. conducted a prospective study to determine the diagnos= tic accuracy of CT in pediatric CRS using the Lund-McKay score. Two cohorts were followed: one undergoing a preoperative CT f= or planning of FESS with known cystic fibrosis or anatomic abnormalities, and = the other group undergoing CT for non-sinusitis reasons. This study revealed an average Lund-McKay score of 10.4 in the group with sinus disease and 2.8 in the gro= up without clinical sinus disease. This revealed that incidental paranasal = mucoperiosteal thickening in the absence of clinical symptoms is present in the pediatric population. When a score of 5 is used to repre= sent true sinus disease, CT scan demonstrated a sensitivity of 86% and specifici= ty of 85%.

CRS, Age and Sinus Surgery

In order to understand the appropriate management of C= RS in children, recognition of successful surgical management and age at interven= tion must be discussed. A cohort s= tudy was performed by Ramadan in 2003 to determine the relationship of age to outcome after FESS in children. A questionnaire was completed by caregivers 12 months after FESS with selecti= ve adenoidectomy for CRS for assessment of symptoms. This study revealed that children 6 years and older had 89% success, whereas, children under 6 years had 73%. Additionally, 9% that required rev= ision surgery were under 6 years. A= fter age stratification, children under 4 years had 35% success, children 4-8 ye= ars had 88% success, and children over 8 years had 86% success. This study also found that children under 3 years had the highest failure rate with 75% requiring revision surgery. Some of the results = of this study are difficult to apply to a larger population as there was a sma= ll patient population in the younger age groups. However, this study does indicate = that older children tend to have better outcomes after FESS compare to younger children with CRS. This may p= rovide insight into management of younger children with perhaps more emphasis on medical therapy.

FESS and Facial Growth

During the early years of pediatric FESS, concern was = raised regarding the effects of surgery on the developing facial skeleton. Animal studies indicated significa= nt detrimental effects when sinonasal surgery was performed on young rabbits and piglets.&nb= sp; In one study, unilateral sinus surgery was performed on piglets with subsequent evaluation of development based on CT finding. This study revealed that on the op= erated side, maxillary and ethmoid sinuses only reache= d a fraction the size of the non-operated side (57% and 65%, respectively). Earlier studies of cleft palate su= rgery and its effects on maxilla growth revealed a greater incidence of midfacial maldevelopment = after cleft palate repair. Another = study of pediatric mandibular fractures revealed significant asymmetry after repair in children.

Wolf published a study of 124 children treated with FE= SS for CRS revealing no clinically significant disturbance in facial bone development. However, only 4%= of patients were under 5 years during the most rapid period of growth of the <= span class=3DSpellE>paranasal sinuses.&n= bsp; In 1996, a study revealed that maxillary sinus = hypoplasia may be a consequence of endoscopic sinus surger= y, but there was no clinically apparent facial asymmetry.

A study by Senior et al. in 2000 evaluated the quantit= ative impact of pediatric sinus surgery on facial growth and development. The study group consisted of child= ren requiring unilateral sinus surgery for periorbital or orbital sinusitis. The control groups were adults without evidence of sinusitis on CT and adults with find= ings of sinusitis on CT and clinical history of childhood sinus symptoms. This study had a mean follow-up of= 6.9 years and found that there was no significant difference in sinus volumes <= span class=3DSpellE>amonght the groups.

A well-known study by Bothwell et al. in 2002 investigated the long-term outcome of facial growth after FESS. This was a retrospective study utilizing anthopometric analysis of 12 fa= cial parameters and qualitative analysis of Caucasian children diagnosed with CRS who underwent FESS versus children with CRS who did not have FESS and normal controls. 10 year follow-up w= as reported in the study. The Pediatric Rhinosinusitis CT Scoring System was = used to determine severity of disease based upon CT findings. The results of this study revealed= no significant difference for anthropometric measurements among the groups. Interestingly, on qualitative eval= uation by a blinded observer, the non-surgical group had a lower score than the gr= oup treated with FESS.

A recent prospective study by Pet= eghen et al. in 2006 revealed that there was no significant difference in cephalometric parameters among children with cystic fibrosis who underwent FESS compared to normal age-matched controls. These studies indicate that FESS d= oes not significantly alter the normal growth and development of the pediatric facial skeleton. However, it = is important to understand that FESS during rapid growth of the facial skeleton had not been thoroughly investigated, and may result in asymmetry.

Safety and Efficacy of Pediatric FESS

Surgical interventions in the pediatric population mus= t be safe and effective to be appropriate option. The safety and efficacy of FESS in adults is well-documented. In= 1998, a meta-analysis was published by Hebert investigating the outcomes of FESS. 8 articles with 832 pat= ients met the inclusion criteria, and the publisher included 50 previously unpublished patients from the home institution. A positive outcome of FESS was fou= nd to be 88.7% with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Additionally, the major complicati= on rate was found to be 0.6% in 6 of the 8 articles included. Blood transfusion requirement and meningitis were the reported complications.

Image-Guided Pediatric FESS

With the advent of image-guided surgery, the ability to perform complex and delicate procedures in the paranas= al sinuses has been enhanced. Identification of obscured landmarks may be difficult in disease states. Indications for computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery are revision surgery; distorted anatomy of development, postoperative, or traum= atic origin; extensive sino-nasal polyposis; pathology involving the frontal, posterior ethmoid, and sphenoid sinuses; disease abutting the skull base, orbit, optic nerve, = or carotid artery; cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea = or conditions where there is a skull-base defect; benign and malignant sino-nasal neoplasms; and= choanal atresia. In children, due to smaller and le= ss distinct structures that may not provide adequate identification of critical structures such as the lamina papyracea and skull-base, image-guidance is an asset to surgeons.

Conclusion

Pediatric sinus disease is sometimes a challenging pro= cess for clinicians. Patients, par= ents, and caregivers seek medical assistance for management of sinusitis. The role of the clinician is to pr= ovide the best recommendations and options available based upon the evidence presently available. Pediatri= c FESS has undergone much debate in the otolaryngologic society. Questionnaires sent = to pediatric otolaryngologists provide an insight = into the contemporary management trends for this process, but do not necessarily reflect the data available in studies.&nbs= p; Further research in this area is needed to understand the long-term success and a more comprehensive understanding of when FESS should be perfo= rmed in the setting of CRS.

Sources

n&nb= sp; = Verwoerd CD, Urbana NA, Nijdam DC. The effects of septal surgery on the growth of = the nose and maxilla. Rhinology 1979;17:53-63.

n&nb= sp; = Bernstein L. The effect of cleft palate operati= ons on subsequent growth of the maxilla. Laryngoscope 1968:1510-1565.

n&nb= sp; = McGuirt WF, Salisbury PL. Mandibular fractures: their effect on growth and dentition. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:257-261.

n&nb= sp; = Kosko JR, Hall BE, Tunkel DE. Acquired maxillary sinus hypoplasia: a consequence of end= oscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 1996;106:1210-1213.

n&nb= sp; = Mair EA, Bolger WE, Breisch E= A. Sinus and facial growth after pedi= atric sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:547-522.

n&nb= sp; = Senior B, Wirtschafter A, Mai C, Becker C, Belenky W. Quantitative impact of ped= iatric sinus surgery on facial growth. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1866-1870.

n&nb= sp; = Bothwell MR, Piccirillo JF, Lusk = RP, Ridenour BD. Long-term outcom= e of facial growth after functional endoscopic sinus surgery 2002;126:628-634.

n&nb= sp; = Ramadan, HH. Surgical management of chronic sin= usitis in children. Laryngoscope 2004;114:2103-2109.

n&nb= sp; = Cable BB, Mair EA. Pediatric functional endoscopic sinus su= rgery: frequently asked questions. A= nnals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology 2006;115:643-657.

n&nb= sp; = Clinical practice guideline: management of sinusitis. Pediatrics 2001;108:798-808.

n&nb= sp; = Campbell JM, Graham M, Gray HC, Bower C, Blaiss MS, Jones SM. Allergic fungal sinusitis in children. Ann Al= lergy Asthma Immunol 2006;96:286-290.

n&nb= sp; = Hebert RL, Bent JP. Meta-analysis of outcomes= of pediatric functional endoscopic sinus surgery.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Laryngoscope 1998;108:796-799.

n&nb= sp; = Clement PA, Blue= stone CD, Gordts F.&= nbsp; Management of rhinosinusitis in children: consensus meeting. Arch Otolayngol Head and Neck Surg 1998;124:31-34.

n&nb= sp; = Lusk, R. Computer-assisted functional endoscopic sinus surgery in children. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2005;38:505-513.

n&nb= sp; = Ramadan HH. Relation of age to outcome after <= span class=3DSpellE>endoscopic sinus surgery in children. Arch Otolaryn= gol Head and Neck Surg 2003;129:175-177.=

&nbs= p;