TITLE: LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL RECONSTRUCTION
SOURCE: UTMB Dept. of Otolaryngology Grand Rounds
Resident Physician: John K. Yoo, M.D.
Faculty Physician: Karen H. Calhoun, M.D., F.A.C.S
Series Editor: Francis B. Quinn, Jr., M.D.
Date: November 13, 1996

|Return to Grand Rounds Index|


"This material was prepared by resident physicians in partial fulfillment of educational requirements established for the Postgraduate Training Program of the UTMB Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and was not intended for clinical use in its present form. It was prepared for the purpose of stimulating group discussion in a conference setting. No warranties, either express or implied, are made with respect to its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. The material does not necessarily reflect the current or past opinions of members of the UTMB faculty and should not be used for purposes of diagnosis or treatment without consulting appropriate literature sources and informed professional opinion."

Anatomy of Hypopharynx

The hypopharynx is the most inferior and longest of the 3 segments of the pharynx. It extends from the level of the tip of the epiglottis superiorly to the lower border of the cricoid cartilage inferiorly. It is divided into 3 regions, namely the pyriform sinuses, posterior pharyngeal wall, and the post-cricoid area.The pyriform sinuses are pyramidal shaped areas with the base situated superiorly and the apex inferiorly. The superior extent is the oropharynx and glossoepiglottic folds. The anterolateral border is the medial surface of the thyroid cartilage and the anteromedial border is the lateral surface of the cricoid/arytenoid cartilages. The sinuses are bounded posteriorly by the lateral and posterior pharyngeal walls. The inferior extent is to the laryngeal ventricles. f

The post-cricoid area is the posterior surface of the arytenoid and cricoid cartilages.

The posterior pharyngeal wall extends from a level at the tip of the epiglottis to the a level at the lower extent of the cricoid cartilage. It meets the posterior oropharyngeal wall superiorly and meets the posterior wall of the esophagus inferiorly.

The hypopharyngeal wall is made up of mucosa, pharyngobasilar fascia, constrictor musculature, buccopharyngeal fascia (in a lumen to external direction).

The mucosa is stratified squamous epithelium. The pharyngobasilar fascia is more developed in the nasopharynx and is less so as it approaches the hypophayrnx. External to the pharyngobasilar fascia is the musculature composed of the middle and inferior constrictors.

The constrictors are innervated by the laryngeal nerves as well as the pharyngeal plexus. The middle constrictor takes its origin from the lesser/greater cornua of the hyoid bone and the inferior constrictor originates from the oblique line of the thyroid cartilage as they both insert into the midline pharyngeal raphe. The lower fibers of the inferior constrictors blend into the cricopharyngeus muscle.

The buccopharyngeal fascia is a thin layer covering the external aspect of the constrictor muscles. There are gaps between the constrictors as they overlap one another.

The glossopharyngeal nerve, styloid ligament, stylopharyngeus muscle, and the lingual artery traverse the gap between the superior and middle constrictor muscles. The area between the middle and inferior constrictors is not a true gap since the thyrohyoid membrane closes this area. However, the superior laryngeal artery and vein, as well as the internal laryngeal nerve traverse this area. The inferior laryngeal artery and vein and the recurrent laryngeal nerve traverse the space between the inferior constrictor and the esophagus.

Anatomy of the Esophagus

The esophagus extends from the lower extent of the hypopharynx (inferior cricoid) superiorly down to the gastro-esophageal junction. The cervical esophagus is that portion of the esophagus above the suprasternal notch.

The esophageal wall is made up of the mucosa, submucosa, and muscle. The mucosa is composed of stratified squamous epithelium and a deeper scant muscular layer, the muscularis mucosa. Nerves and blood vessels traverse a loose connective tissue layer, the submucosa. The outermost layer is the muscular layer made up of an inner circular and an outer longitudinal muscles.

The lymphatic drainage systems for both the hypopharynx and the esophagus are richly supplied. The superior drainage is into the superior and middle jugular nodes, and the inferior drainage is into the lower jugular nodes as well as the paratracheal nodes. The cervical esophagus also drains into the mediastinal nodes.

Function

The hypopharynx is involved in the third phase of swallowing (pharyngeal phase) as the food bolus is propelled by pharyngeal peristalsis into the cervical esophagus. Once the food bolus is received by the cervical esophagus, it is propelled by muscular contractions into the stomach. In this way, both the hypopharynx and the esophagus serve as dynamic conduits for food passage.

History of Reconstruction

Czerny performed the first recorded pharyngoesophageal reconstruction in 1877 and Mikulicz performed the first successful cervical esophageal reconstruction in 1886. Both used local cervical skin flaps for reconstruction, as it was the earliest method of reconstruction of defects in this area. Multiple techniques of reconstruction have emerged from the turn of the century until the present.

Wookey in the early 1940's came up with the standard reconstruction technique of the time by using the anterior neck skin in a staged procedure to form a neo-hypopharynx/esophagus conduit. The technique involved creating a pharyngostoma and esophagostoma initially, followed by tubing the anterior cervical skin at a later stage to form a conduit from the pharynx to the esophagus. The raw area remaining was then covered by a split thickness skin graft (STSG). Various modifications have evolved, but they only alter the method of covering the remaining raw area after tubing the anterior cervical skin.

Tissue transposition techniques were then popularized by the advent of the deltopectoral flap of Bakamjian in the 1960's. This flap however was supplanted by the myocutaneous flaps in the late 1970's. Aryian and Theogaraj in the late 1970's and early 1980's reported using pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps for the reconstruction of hypopharyngeal/cervical esophageal defects.

Abdominal visceral transposition techniques evolved in the 1960's and 1970's to reconstruct defects in this area and include gastric pull-up by Ong and Lee, as well as revascularized autografts of hollow segments (such as free jejunum by Huguier et al) and colon transposition by Keling and Vuillet.

Most recently, fasciocutaneous free flaps have been developed for reconstruction. Harii in 1985 reported use of a tubed radial forearm free flap for reconstruction in this area. Subsequently, lateral thigh and scapular fasciocutaneous free flaps have also been developed.

Reconstructive goals

The ideal reconstructive technique to reconstruct defects resulting from resection of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus should restore normal anatomy, provide normal breathing without a tracheostomy, allow normal dynamic swallowing without aspiration, and participate in normal speech. Unfortunately, no such technique currently exists, but should shoot for:

  • single stage reconstruction
  • low morbidity and mortality
  • fshort hospitalization
  • short time interval leading to oral alimentation
  • successful speech
  • tolerate XRT
  • allow second team to harvest donor tissue concurrently with resection
  • flow morbidity of donor tissue harvest with hearty vascular pedicle
  • minmal hair-bearing skin in the donor tissue
  • Reconstruction techniques

  • A. Local tissues
  • 1. Primary closure
  • If sufficient mucosa remains following resection of the tumor, it may be closed primarily around a nasogastric tube.
  • 2. Laryngeal flaps
  • In order for laryngeal flaps to be used for reconstruction of defects
  • following pharyngolaryngectomy, an hemilarynyx with its vessels must be preserved on the uninvolved side. The cartilages are then removed keeping the perichondrium intact. This perichondrium is then used to repair the hypopharyngeal defect.
  • B. Skin grafts
  • Split thickness skin grafts may also be used to repair defects.
  • C. Cutaneous flaps
  • 1. Cervical skin
  • Following pharyngolaryngectomy, a pharyngostoma and an esophagostoma are created, followed by tubing the anterior cervical skin at a later stage to form a conduit from the pharynx to the esophagus. The raw area remaining was then covered by a split thickness skin graft (STSG), local or regional flap. Disadvantages include higher rate of surgical complications, soiling of the tracheostoma with saliva, and the multi-staged nature of the procedure.
  • 2. Deltopectoral
  • A deltopectoral flap is raised and tubed prior to transposition into the neck. It is then anastamosed end-to-end with the oropharynx and the esophagus is anastamosed end-to-side to the DP flap. At a later stage, the distal end of the anastamosis is converted to an end-to-end anastamosis, and the remaining deltopectoral flap is returned to the chest. This is a direct cutaneous axial flap supplied by the anterior thoracic perforators of the internal mammary artery for the first four intercostal spaces. Like the cervical skin flap technique, it is a staged procedure, and as such, prolongs hospitalization and delays swallowing.
  • D. Myocutaneous flaps
  • 1. Pectoralis major
  • This pedicled flap based on the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial artery is the most commonly used in the class of myocutaneous flaps. This technique is one-staged with the flap used to repair a partial defect or tubed to reconstruct a circumferential defect. The flap is reliable, but often difficult to tube the flap for circumferential defects due to its bulkiness.
  • 2. Latissimus dorsi
  • This flap based on the thoracodorsal vessels can also be used to reconstruct defects of the hypopharynx/cervical esophagus much like the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap.
  • 3. Trapezius
  • Another myocutaneous flap similar to pectoralis major myocutaneous flap based on the following blood supply:
  • peninsular flap-occipital artery/posterior intercostals
  • upper island flap-transverse cervical vessels
  • lower island-transverse cervical/dorsal scapular artery
  • E. Visceral transposition
  • 1. Gastric pull-up
  • First reported in early 1960's, it is a single staged procedure that requires resection of the esophagus in its entirety. It is especially if there is any questionof skip lesions involving the esophagus. Following laryngopharyngoesophagectomy, stomach is mobilized in the abdomen and brought up superiorly as high as the nasopharynx if needed. It is left pedicled on the right gastric and gastroepiploic vessels, and sutured to the remaining mujcosal tissue and base of tongue, with at least three takcing sutures to the prevertebral fascia. There is only one anastamotic site and two team approach is possible. Despite pyloroplasty and vagotomy, regurgitation can be a problem. This technique is also a highly invasive one with significant morbidity (50%) and mortality rates of 10-15%.
  • 2. Jejunal free flap
  • First described in the late 1950's, a segment of jejunum is isolated on its mesenteric vessels and anastamosed to reconstruct circumferential defects or opened along the antimesenteric border to repair partial defects. It is a single stage procedure, the caliber of jejunum matches that of the cervical esophagus well, and the muscular wall of the jejunum is better than that of the patulous colon. This technique however has a significant post-op complication rate, requires abdominal surgery, requires microvascular abilities, and has 2 anastamotic sites.
  • 3. Colon interposition
  • Colon from the left or right side can used either as a pedicled autograft or a revascularized autograft. Has fallen out of favor due to high complication rate, need for abdominal surgery, tendency for the graft to become distended and patulous, and lengthy hospital stay.
  • F. Fasciocutaneous free flap
  • 1. Radial forearm
  • Fasciocutaneous free flaps from the radial forearm based on the radial artery can be used to repair defects following pharyngolaryngectomy. They are thin and pliable to allow tubing the flap and staggering the circumferential closure to minimized stenosis. The donor site cannot be closed primarily and microsurgical know-how is required.
  • 2. Lateral thigh
  • Lateral cutaneous thigh flap based on the third perforating branch of the profunda femoris artery and its venae comitantes. Donor site can be closed primarily.
  • 3. Scapula/parascapular
  • These flaps based on the cutaneous branches of the circumflex scapular artery are alternatives to the above two flaps, but two-team approach is impossible due to the lateral positioning of the patient.
  • The various techniques are compared based on a literature review, and the data shown in the following table:
    Recon.    Years     Number of   Mortalit Fistula  Stenosis Successful  
    method              patients    y (%)    (%)       (%)     Swallow     
    (%)         
    
    Cervical    42-84       214       6.5     38        38         86      
    flaps                                                                  
    
    DP flaps    69-92       228        2      37        50         79      
    
    Pect        80-92       203        1      37        18         88      
    flaps                                                                  
    
    Trap        82-89       107        7      31        21         81      
    flaps                                                                  
    
    Gastric     60-90       402       12      16        10         81      
    pullup                                                                 
    
    Jejunu      70-94       528        5      19        25         87      
    
    FCF         85-95       59         0      42        8          83      
    
    
    

    The techniques are also compared in terms of length of hospitalization and time interval to successful swallowing in the following table, as well comparative tolerance to radiation shown in the last table:

    Reconstruction       Hospital stay      Swallow interval    
    Method                  (weeks)              (days)         
    
    myocutaneous flap         4-12                20-60         
    
    gastric pullup            2-4                 7-12          
    
    jejunum                   2-4                 7-12          
    
    fasciocutaneous           2-4                 7-12          
    free flap                                                   
    
    
    

    Reconstruction      Radiation Tolerance   
    technique                  (cGy)          
    
    Skin/Muscle                7000+          
    
    Stomach                  4000-5000        
    
    Jejunum                  6000-6500        
    
    
    

    Reconstruction options

    Various factors determine which reconstructive technique is used to repair a defect following pharyngolaryngectomy. These include patients factors (are they physical fit or are willing to undergo such procedures?), reconstructive technique factors (are there facilities, resources, and know-how to perform the various techniques?), and factors relating directly to the size and extent of the defect.

    The defect is considered minor if the defect is less than 30% of the circumference of the pharynx or there is resection of no more than 2 cm of the pharyngeal wall. The defect is considered major if it involves more than 30% but less than 70% of the pharyngeal circumference or a resection of more than 2 cm of mucosa, but greater than 2 cm of mucosa is left. The defect is considered circumferential if the defect is greater than 70% of the circumference of the pharyngeal wall or there is less than 2 cm of mucosa is remaining. The other factors include the inferior extent of the tumor resection, as well as whether a hemilarynx can be salvaged for possible laryngeal flap reconstruction.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Anthony JP, et al : Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction using tubed free radial forearm flap. clinics Plast Surg 21: 137, 1994.

    2. Baek S, Lawson W, Biller HF: Reconstruction of hypopharynx and cervical esophagus with pectoralis major island myocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 7:18, 1981.

    3. Bains MS, Spiro RH: Pharyngolaryngectomy, total extrathoracic esophagectomy and gastric transposition. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149:693, 1979.

    4. Bakamjian VY: A two-stage method for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a primary pectoral skin flap Plast Reconstr Surg 36:173, 1965.

    5. Bakamjian VY, Ling MD, Rigg BR: Experience with the medially based deltopectoral flap in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Br J Plast Surg 24:173, 1971.

    6. Barazan L, Comoretto R: Hemipharyngectomy and hemilaryngectomy for pyriform sinus cancer: reconstruction with the remaining larynx and hypopharynx and with tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 103: 82, 1993.

    7. Carlson GW, et al: Total reconstruction of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus: a 20 year experience. Ann Plast Surg 29:408, 1992.

    8. Coleman JJ, Reconstruction of the pharynx after resection for cancer: A comparison of methods. Ann Surg 209:554, 1989.

    9. Deane L, et al: Free jejunal transfer for the reconstruction of pharyngeal and cervical esophageal defects. Ann Plast Surg 19:499, 1987.

    10. De Vries EJ, et al : Hypopharyngeal reconstruction: A comparison of two alternatives. Laryngoscope 99: 614, 1989.

    11. DeSanto LW, Carpenter RJ: Reconstruction of the pharynx and upper esophagus after resection of cancer. Head & Neck Surg 2:369, 1980.

    12. Devineni VR, et al: Tolerance of gastric mucosal flaps to postoperative irradiation. Laryngoscope 101: 462, 1991.

    13. Fabian RL: Reconstruction of the laryngopharynx and cervical esophagus. Laryngoscope 94: 1334, 1984

    14. Ferguson JL, DeSanto LW : Total Pharygolaryngectomy and cervical esophagectomy with jejunal autotransplant reconstruction: Complication and results. Laryngoscope 98: 911, 1988

    15. Flynn MB, et al : Reconstruction with free bowel autografts after Pharyngoesophageal or Laryngopharyngoesophageal resection. Am J Surg 158: 333, 1989.

    16. Frederickson JM et al: Gastric pull-up vs deltopectoral flap for reconstruction of the cervical esophagus. Arch Otolaryngol 107:613, 1981.

    17. Gullane P, et al : Pharyngeal reconstruction: Current Controversies. J. Otolaryngol. 16: 169, 1987.

    18.. Harrison DFN: Rehabilitation problems after pharyngogastric anastomosis. Arch Otolaryngol 104:244, 1978.

    19. Harrison DFN: Surgical management of hypopharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol 105:149, 1979.

    20. Huguier M et al: Results of 117 esophageal replacements. Surg Gynecol Obstet 130:1054, 1970.

    21. Leonard JR, Maran AGD: Reconstruction of the cervical esophagus via gastric anastomosis. Laryngoscope 80:849, 1970.

    22. Lewis RS: Pharyngeal reconstruction after pharyngolaryngectomy. J Laryngol Otol 79:771, 1965.

    23. Maddox WA, et al: Total Pharyngeal reconstruction using a pectoralis major myocutaneuos tunnel. Arch Surg 123: 391, 1988.

    24. McCaffrey TV, Fisher J: Effect of radiotherapy on the outcome of pharyngeal reconstruction using free jejunal transfer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96: 22, !987.

    25. Missotten FE: Historical review of pharyngo-oesophageal reconstruction after resection for carcinoma of the pharynx and cervical oesophagus. Clin. Otolaryngol. 8: 345, 1983.

    26. Montgomery WW: Reconstruction of the cervical esophagus. Arch Otolaryngol 77:609, 1963.

    27. Murakami Y et al: Esophageal reconstruction with a skin- grafted pectoralis major muscle flap. Arch Otolaryngol 108:719, 1982.

    28. Mustard RA: The use of the Wookey operation for carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 111:577, 1960.

    29. Nassif TM et al: The parascapular flap: a new cutaneous microsurgical free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(4):591, 1982.

    30. Neifeld JP, et al: Tubed pectoralis major musculocutaneous flaps for cervical esophagus replacement. Ann Plast Surg 11: 26, 1983.

    31. Ong GB, Lee TC: Pharyngogastric anastomosis after esophagopharyngectomy for carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. Br J Surg 48:193, 1960.

    32. Robertson M, Robinson JM: Immediate pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol 110: 386, 1984.

    33. Sambataro G, et al: Reconstruction of the hypopharynx following extensive loss of mucosa. Laryngoscope 94: 671, 1984.

    34. Schechter GL, et al : Combined treatment of advanced cancer of the laryngopharynx and cervical esophagus. Laryngoscope 92: 11, 1982.

    35. Schechter GL, et al : Functional evaluation of Pharyngoesophageal reconstructive Techniques. Arch otolaryngol 113:40, 1987.

    36. Schuller DE: Reconstructive options for pharyngeal and/or cervical esophageal defects. Arch Otolaryngol 111: 193, 1985.

    37. Silver CF: Reconstruction after pharyngolaryngectomy- esophagectomy. Am J Surg 132:428, 1976.

    38. Silver CF, Som ML: Reconstruction of the cervical esophagus after total pharyngolaryngectomy: a modified Wookey operation.

    Ann Surg 165:239, 1967. 39. Stell PM: Esophageal replacement by transposed stomach. Archr Otolaryngol 91:166, 1970.

    40. Stell PM, Maisels DO, Brown GA: Immediate pharyngeal repair after pharyngolaryngectomy using the medially based chest flap. J Laryngol Otol 84:1113, 1970.

    41. Surkin MI, Lawson W, Biller HF: Analysis of the methods of pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Head Neck Surg 6(5),953, 1984.

    42. Theogaraj SD et al: The pectoralis major myocutaneous island flap in single-stage reconstruction of the pharyngoesophageal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:267, 1980.

    43. Withers EH et al: Immediate reconstruction of the pharynx and cervical esophagus with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap following laryngopharyngectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:898, 1981.

    44. Wookey H: The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the pharynx and upper esophagus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 75:449, 1941.