BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.4//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Central Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Central Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Central Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Feel free to share this announcement with colleagues who may be
  interested.\nAbstractRandomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are an indispens
 able source of evidence for evaluating the efficacy of treatments across n
 early all disease areas. With the growing availability of multiple treatme
 nt options\, Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) has&nbsp\;gained inc
 reasing importance in supporting informed healthcare decisions. However\, 
 the design and analysis of effectiveness trials are significantly more com
 plex than those of traditional efficacy trials. A major factor contributin
 g to this complexity is the&nbsp\;inclusion of active comparator arm(s) in
  RCTs\, which gives rise to superiority and non-inferiority (NI) trial des
 igns. Among these\, the non-inferiority design plays a fundamental role in
  CER and will be a key focus of this talk. Non-inferiority (NI) trials&nbs
 p\;are inherently complex\, as they typically involve active control and r
 equire the specification of a non-inferiority margin a priori. Additional 
 complications arise when the outcome of interest is not continuous\, such 
 as binary\, count or time-to-event outcomes.&nbsp\;In this talk\, Dr. Ghos
 h will provide a broad overview of the key challenges in designing and ana
 lyzing NI trials\, drawing from his decade-long work in this area. Dr. Gho
 sh will also present examples highlighting specific difficulties when the 
 outcome of interest&nbsp\;is time-to-event and discuss methodological cons
 iderations and potential solutions.HybridIn-person: UHC 4.108Zoom: Link(Lu
 nch will be provided if attending in person)
DTEND:20251021T180000Z
DTSTAMP:20260717T082223Z
DTSTART:20251021T170000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:DMAC CERCIT Seminar Series: Challenges in Non-Inferiority Testing
UID:RFCALITEM639198553431114303
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><span style="text-decoration:underline\;"><
 strong>Feel free to share this announcement with colleagues who may be int
 erested.</strong></span><span style="text-decoration:underline\;"><strong>
 </strong></span></p>\n<p><span style="text-decoration:underline\;"><strong
 >Abstract</strong></span></p><div><p>Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) a
 re an indispensable source of evidence for evaluating the efficacy of trea
 tments across nearly all disease areas. With the growing availability of m
 ultiple treatment options\, Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) has&n
 bsp\;gained increasing importance in supporting informed healthcare decisi
 ons. However\, the design and analysis of effectiveness trials are signifi
 cantly more complex than those of traditional efficacy trials. A major fac
 tor contributing to this complexity is the&nbsp\;inclusion of active compa
 rator arm(s) in RCTs\, which gives rise to superiority and non-inferiority
  (NI) trial designs. Among these\, the non-inferiority design plays a fund
 amental role in CER and will be a key focus of this talk. Non-inferiority 
 (NI) trials&nbsp\;are inherently complex\, as they typically involve activ
 e control and require the specification of a non-inferiority margin a prio
 ri. Additional complications arise when the outcome of interest is not con
 tinuous\, such as binary\, count or time-to-event outcomes.&nbsp\;In this 
 talk\, Dr. Ghosh will provide a broad overview of the key challenges in de
 signing and analyzing NI trials\, drawing from his decade-long work in thi
 s area. Dr. Ghosh will also present examples highlighting specific difficu
 lties when the outcome of interest&nbsp\;is time-to-event and discuss meth
 odological considerations and potential solutions.</p><p><strong>Hybrid</s
 trong><br />In-person: UHC 4.108<br />Zoom: <a href="https://www.zoomgov.c
 om/webinar/register/WN_herRtQgoT1qEpJCyppP8jQ" target="_blank">Link</a></p
 ></div>(Lunch will be provided if attending in person)
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
