BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 METHOD:PUBLISH PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 14.4//EN BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Central Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231102T020000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11 TZNAME:Central Standard Time TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0600 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20230301T020000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3 TZNAME:Central Daylight Time TZOFFSETFROM:-0600 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DESCRIPTION:Marcel and Josephine Patterson Memorial Lecture in the Medical HumanitiesPerceptions of Vulnerability and Moral Distress in Neurological Care \; \;Georgina Morley\, PhD\, MSc\, RN (UK)Nurse Ethicist\, As sistant StaffDirector\, Nursing Ethics ProgramAssistant ProfessorCleveland ClinicLerner College of MedicineandLauren R. Sankary\, JD\, MAAssociate D irector\n Neuroethics ProgramCenter for Bioethics\n Cleveland Clinic\n &nb sp\;Thursday\, October 21\, 202112:00 p.m.&mdash\;1:00 p.m. \;Register in advance for this webinar:https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Nke0o15xS jexPyKEZctrvwAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email con taining information about joining the webinar. \;A free Social Work CE U will be offered for this presentation. After the presentation\, please r each out to Savannah Parks at sjparks@utmb.edu to claim your CEU. \;&n bsp\;Using case studies\, we explore ethical complexities commonly arising in neurological care that compound moral distress. First\, we analyze obs tacles to shared decision-making for patients at the margins of decision-m aking capacity or whose capacity\n fluctuates over the course of their clinical care\, and the moral distress that can arise when there are incap acitated refusals of care. Second\, we explore situations in which cogniti ve impairments present a possible contraindication to life-prolonging\n interventions. We identify compounding factors likely to exacerbate moral distress in neurological care\, including epistemic injustices\, communic ation barriers\, and the perceived vulnerability of patients with neurolog ical conditions. explore connections\n between sources of vulnerability identified in Kenneth Kipnis&rsquo\; bioethical taxonomy of vulnerability and heightened moral distress amongst healthcare professionals. We conclu de with recommendations to mitigate moral distress that may arise in\n caring for cognitively vulnerable patient populations. \; \; \ ; \; \; DTEND:20211021T180000Z DTSTAMP:20240329T134628Z DTSTART:20211021T170000Z LOCATION: SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Perceptions of Vulnerability and Moral Distress in Neurological Car e UID:RFCALITEM638472987882659992 X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:
 \;
 \;
Georgina Morley\, PhD\, MSc\, RN (UK)
Nurse Ethicist\, Assistant Staff
Director\,
Nursing Ethics Program
Assistant Professor
Cleveland Clinic
Lerner College of
Medicine
and
Lauren R. Sankary\, JD\, MA
Associate Director
\n Neuroethics Program
Center for Bioethics
\n Cleveland Clinic\n
 \;
 \;
Register in advance for this webinar:
https://zoom.us/webinar/regist er/WN_Nke0o15xSjexPyKEZctrvw
After registering\, you will receive a confirmation email
containing information about joining the webinar.
 \;
A free Social Work CEU will be offered for
this presentation. After the presentation\,
please reach out to Sava
nnah Parks at sjparks@utmb.edu to cl
aim your CEU.
 \;
 \;Using case studies\, we explore ethi cal complexities commonly arising in neurological care that compound moral distress. First\, we analyze obstacles to shared decision-making for pati ents at the margins of decision-making capacity or whose capacity\n flu ctuates over the course of their clinical care\, and the moral distress th at can arise when there are incapacitated refusals of care. Second\, we ex plore situations in which cognitive impairments present a possible contrai ndication to life-prolonging\n interventions. We identify compounding f actors likely to exacerbate moral distress in neurological care\, includin g epistemic injustices\, communication barriers\, and the perceived vulner ability of patients with neurological conditions. explore connections\n between sources of vulnerability identified in Kenneth Kipnis&rsquo\; bio ethical taxonomy of vulnerability and heightened moral distress amongst he althcare professionals. We conclude with recommendations to mitigate moral distress that may arise in\n caring for cognitively vulnerable patient populations.
 \;
 \;
< p style="text-align:center\;"> \;&n bsp\;
 \;
END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR