Elective Title: Evaluation, Diagnosis and Management -Hospitalized Patients in a UTMB Community-Based Hospital | |||
Course Number: MEDU-4162 | |||
Elective Type: clinical | Duration/Weeks: 4 | Max Enrollment: 1 | |
Prerequisites: Successful completion of Year 3 | |||
Additional Requirements: N/A | |||
Responsible Faculty Director: Michael Eisenberg, MD | Periods Offered: 1-6, 9-13 excluding holiday period 8 | ||
Coordinator: Tamika Thibodeaux | Other Faculty: | ||
Location to Report on First Day: Clear Lake Hospital - Please contact Tamika Thibodeaux at trthibod@utmb.edu. |
Goals |
Enhance the independent evaluation, diagnosis and management of hospitalized patients in a UTMB community-based hospital. |
Objectives |
1. To improve and refine the ability to conduct an interview, perform a physical examination, compile a relevant problem list, formulate differential diagnosis, develop a thoughtful and thorough assessment, and prepare plans for the management of the patient. 2. To refine skills of the oral presentation of the new patient and follow up patients to the attending physician. 3. To practice and improve the interpersonal skills needed to address the social and psychological needs of the patient and the family. 4. To develop skills in creating and executing an appropriate management plan for common medical problems. 5. To become comfortable with an increased level of responsibility in the management of patients. 6. To coordinate care between different health professionals including care management, nursing staff and consultants. |
Description of course activities |
The student will function in a role analogous to that of an intern. Student will be able to enter orders into Epic EMR and will undertake primary clinical responsibilities for certain number of the patients on the team. Orders must be signed by the attending physician. The student will round daily (including weekends). Students will be paired up with an attending physician and will take days off depending on the physicians work schedule each month. Students will generally work a 60- hour week. The student will also attend multidisciplinary rounds (POCR), M&M conferences and other scheduled conferences within the Department of Internal Medicine as determined by their attending physician keeping in mind that patient care responsibilities take priority. |
Type of students who would benefit from the course |
Students who are pursuing a career in primary care or who are interested in a career in Internal Medicine. |
Weekly Schedule | ||||
Estimated Course Activities (Start-Time/Finish-Time): | ||||
Day of Week | AM | PM | ||
Monday | 0800 | 1700 | ||
Tuesday | 0800 | 1700 | ||
Wednesday | 0800 | 1700 | ||
Thursday | 0800 | 1700 | ||
Friday | 0800 | 1700 | ||
Saturday | ||||
Sunday | ||||
Average number of patients seen per week: 25 |
||||
Call Schedule: No |
Research / Other Course Activities | |
(estimated schedule) | |
Activity | Hours per Week |
Faculty Contact-Time | 32 |
Self-Directed Study | 1 |
Data-Collection/Analysis | |
Other |
Method of Student Evaluation | ||
1. Clinical Observation | ||
A. | Where are students observed on this elective? | |
Inpatient Service
Ambulatory
Surgery
Standardized
patients Patients simulators Other |
||
B. | Frequency - How often are students observed clinically? | |
Daily | ||
C. | Format - What method(s) are used to document the student's clinical performance? | |
Daily oral feedback
End of period oral feedback
Written feedback Other |
2. Oral Presentation | ||
A. | Audience - To whom does the student present? | |
Daily to Faculty on rounds and in clinic in Internal Medicine. | ||
B. | Frequency / Duration of Presentation(s)? | |
Daily patient presentations. | ||
C. | Format - What guidelines are set for the student's presentation? | |
Formal oral presentations, written consultation notes and H&Ps. | ||
D. | Assessment - Who assesses the student's presentation performance? | |
Self-assessment Peer assessment Faculty assessment | ||
E. | Method of content selection | |
Current cases Student-selected topic Assigned topic |
3. Written Assignment (H&P's, notes, papers, abstracts, etc.) | ||
A. | Frequency of written assignment(s)? | |
N/A | ||
B. | Format - What guidelines are set for the student's written work? | |
N/A | ||
C. | Length of written assignment(s)? | |
Abstract Annotated bibliography 1 - 2 page paper 3+ page paper | ||
D. | Are recent references required? No If yes, how are they selected? | |
E. | Method of content selection - e.g. student-selected, relate to cases, etc.? | |
N/A | ||
F. | Audience - Who assesses the student's written performance? | |
Peer Assessment Faculty Assessment Other |
4. Examination | ||
Format | ||
Oral
Written multiple choice
Written essay / short answer
OSCE Other |
5. Extra Course Activities | ||
What expectations do you have for the student to demonstrate participation in the elective (e.g. small group activities, seminars, thoughtful questions, providing resources, journal club, resident lecture attendance)? | ||
Daily attendance, participation in progression of care rounds (POCR) and morbidity and mortality meetings (M&Ms), and thoughtful questions. |
6. Additional Costs | ||
Please list any additional costs and/or purchases (books, materials, movies to watch, etc.) that are required for this course. Include an estimated total cost. If there are no additional costs, please enter "None". | ||
None |
7. Other Modes of Evaluation | ||
Please explain below. | ||
N/A |
8. If this course is an Acting Internship, please complete the following: | ||
A. | Objectives for the AI should relate directly to the Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs).
Each AI should describe how the four key Year-4 EPAs that our school has identified as being Year-4 skills are
assessed. The Year-4 objectives are:
1. Entering and discussing orders/prescriptions.Specify how the student will be given formative feedback on their clinical skills. |
|
B. |
Year-4 students should demonstrate mastery of EPAs they developed in the clerkship year, including recommending and interpreting common diagnostic and screening tests, and performing general procedures of a physician. They should be able to demonstrate masterfully and independently skills they mastered in Years 2-3, including efficiently performing comprehensive admission-notes and succinct daily progress notes and perform accurate, concise, and hypothesis-driven clinical presentations, form clinical questions and retrieve evidence to advance patient care. They should be able to demonstrate basic understanding of and beginning mastery of collaborate as a member of the interprofessional team and identify system failures and contribute to a culture of safety improvement. List advanced clinical skills that a student will be assured an opportunity to practice. |
|
C. |
How specifically will this AI build on developing skills from the clerkship year to prepare students for internship? |
|
D. |
What opportunities will typically be available to all students who take this AI (procedures, required presentations, etc.)? What opportunities may be available based on patient load/presentation or student initiative (ie. Writing a case report)? |
|
E. |
An AI should have expectation of a minimum of 32 hours per week of clinical responsibilities. Duty hours should be capped at ACGME limits for an intern, thus up to 24 hours followed by 4 hours of activities related to patient safety, education, and handoff. Students cannot work more than 80 hours per week averaged over 4 weeks. They can only have 1 day off in a 7-day work week with 8 hours off between shifts. Clinical responsibilities will vary depending on specialty, but how is the student functioning with work commensurate to a PGY1 with an appropriate level of training? |
|
F. |
How is the student demonstrating drawing clinical conclusions and/or developing a management plan and documentation as an intern would do? |
|
G. |
How and by whom will midpoint feedback be provided to the student? How will you remediate deficiencies identified at midpoint? |
|
H. |
Acting Internship students often seek letters of recommendation following their experience. How many different Faculty will work directly with the student and have knowledge of the student's abilities to detail in a written evaluation? Describe the degree of supervision and interaction with faculty vs. residents or other providers and how feedback will be obtained if more direct work is with residents or other providers. |
|